Bug 1415702
| Summary: | RFE for RHOS 10 Director Installation and Usage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Nikhil Shetty <nshetty> |
| Component: | documentation | Assignee: | Dan Macpherson <dmacpher> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 10.0 (Newton) | CC: | dmacpher, lbopf, nshetty, srevivo |
| Target Milestone: | async | ||
| Target Release: | 10.0 (Newton) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-09-26 12:46:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nikhil Shetty
2017-01-23 13:19:42 UTC
Technically, all the parameters on this page are optional. If you omit them, they use the default values. I'll include a note about this. However, in the case of the undercloud_service_certificate, I would say this parameter is recommended for most enterprise setups. Most enterprise setups would be using SSL/TLS. Hi Hikhil, Going through my backlog and found this BZ. Have added a line to the undercloud config: "The undercloud.conf file contains settings to configure your undercloud. If you omit or comment out a parameter, the undercloud installation uses the default value." https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/10/html-single/director_installation_and_usage/#sect-Configuring_the_Director Does that suit the needs of this BZ? Hi dan, Thanks for providing the Details. Please, do go ahead and close this bug. Thanks, Nikhil! |