Bug 1415829

Summary: Backport: [RFE] [Neutron] [LBaaS v2] Loadbalancers should be rescheduled when a LBaaS agent goes offline
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Nir Magnezi <nmagnezi>
Component: openstack-neutron-lbaasAssignee: Nir Magnezi <nmagnezi>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Toni Freger <tfreger>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 10.0 (Newton)CC: amuller, aperotti, apevec, dcadzow, jschluet, lhh, lpeer, mgandolf, mlopes, nlevinki, nyechiel, oblaut, pablo.iranzo, paldeala, sclewis, tfreger
Target Milestone: z2Keywords: FeatureBackport, FutureFeature, OtherQA, Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: 10.0 (Newton)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-neutron-lbaas-9.1.0-3.el7ost Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
This enhancement adds the ability to automatically reschedule load balancers from dead LBaaS agents. Previously, load balancers could be scheduled across multiple LBaaS agents, however if a hypervisor died, the load balancers scheduled to that node would cease operation. With this update, these load balancers are automatically rescheduled to a different agent. This feature is turned off by default and controlled using `allow_automatic_lbaas_agent_failover`.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1325861 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-23 16:34:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1325861    
Bug Blocks: 1046780, 1273812    

Comment 3 Nir Magnezi 2017-02-15 13:42:33 UTC
QE: Find verification Steps in Bug #1325861 attachment 1250611 [details]

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-02-23 16:34:47 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0314.html