Bug 1415948
Summary: | Request for flatpak in epel7 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ben Konrath <ben> |
Component: | flatpak | Assignee: | David King <amigadave> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | amigadave, fat.lobyte9 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-10-08 11:57:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1413376, 1413382 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Ben Konrath
2017-01-24 07:55:48 UTC
I have a COPR for testing: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/amigadave/flatpak-epel7/ A newer json-glib is not required with the latest flatpak (0.8.1). Ok, great. I initially built flatpak 0.8.0 which didn't compile with json-glib-1.0.2-1.el7. I'm looking forward to seeing this in epel. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. Hi, is there any news on moving this package to EPEL 7? I would quite like to see flatpak support in CentOS. Also, why is it reported against Fedora 26 instead of Fedora EPEL? Would it be better there? flatpak is now in RHEL7, so will not be added to EPEL7. The COPR that I maintain still has the most recent version (rather than the most recent version from the stable branch, in RHEL). |