Bug 1416154

Summary: visibility options do not affect service buttons
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Felix Dewaleyne <fdewaley>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Jozef Zigmund <jzigmund>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Shveta <sshveta>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.6.0CC: cpelland, fdewaley, hkataria, jhardy, jzigmund, mpovolny, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: cfme-future   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard: service
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-24 17:55:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Felix Dewaleyne 2017-01-24 17:27:11 UTC 
Description of problem:
visibility options do not affect service buttons

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.6.3.3

How reproducible:
all the time

Steps to Reproduce:
1.set up a service and provision it a couple times
2.set up another user with a different role 
3.assign one service to the other user
4. create a button outside of a button group for a service tha should only be visible to the admin role
5. log in as the second user and view his service

Actual results:
the button is displayed

Expected results:
the button is not displayed

Additional info:
Comment 2 Harpreet Kataria 2017-01-24 21:48:25 UTC 
Jozef,

I was not able to recreate this issue on upstream master codebase, can you please try to recreate on 5.6.3.3. We can discuss further if needed once you recreate the issue. 

Thanks,
~Harpreet
Comment 3 Felix Dewaleyne 2017-02-07 09:57:28 UTC 
reproduced against 5.7.0.17-1 - that version is affected.
Comment 4 Jozef Zigmund 2017-02-13 17:43:50 UTC 
Hi Felix, I think the problem could be settings of the Role. You need to set "VM & Template Access Restriction" (on 5.6.z), "Access Restriction for Services, VMs, and Templates" (on current master) to "Only User Owned" or "Only User or Group Owned" (depends what's expected restriction), than you could see expected result. Can you verify it ?