Bug 1416501

Summary:	[RFE] Cant filter list of failure hosts with Remote execution
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Pradeep Kumar Surisetty <psuriset>
Component:	Remote Execution	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2.6	CC:	aruzicka, bbuckingham, cduryee, inecas, jcallaha, mmccune, pierre-yves.goubet, pmoravec, psuriset
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-29 07:00:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pradeep Kumar Surisetty 2017-01-25 16:09:06 UTC

Description of problem:

Run patch update with Remote Execution on scale setup. 
There might be failures for 2 different reasons

   1) satellite issues
   2) hosts side issues

Cant filter the failure nodes in such large scale setup. 



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update patch on scale setup 
2. Filter failed ones.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Pavel Moravec 2017-01-27 16:45:00 UTC

Workaround:

in the job invocation page, click to "Rerun failed". Search query will then conatin the names of failed systems :)

Comment 3 Adam Ruzicka 2017-02-15 13:28:48 UTC

Is just somehow obtaining a list of failed (and/or success) hosts enough for you or do you want to further split them into groups by "failure type"?

Comment 5 Pradeep Kumar Surisetty 2017-06-01 04:33:35 UTC

(In reply to aruzicka from comment #3)
> Is just somehow obtaining a list of failed (and/or success) hosts enough for
> you or do you want to further split them into groups by "failure type"?

would be good to split them into groups by "failure type". When we are running at large scale, it would be challenging to go through all of them. 
if we have seperate list, its easier to debug respective hosts based on failure type.

Comment 6 Adam Ruzicka 2017-08-29 07:00:26 UTC

Marking as duplicate of BZ1423682 because it delivers almost what was requested in this BZ. Feel free to reopen this one if you feel the fix provided by the other BZ is inadequate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1423682 ***