| Summary: | New manifest upload doesn't refresh automatically subscriptions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Edu Alcaniz <ealcaniz> |
| Component: | Subscription Management | Assignee: | Eric Helms <ehelms> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.1.9 | CC: | bbuckingham, bkearney, ealcaniz, ehelms, jsherril, malonso |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-05-19 12:46:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Edu Alcaniz
2017-01-25 16:17:58 UTC
"It behaves as intended. The desktop subscription SVCRH08V50 is designed for hypervisor, which can host up to 50 virtual desktops. Subscription with sku SVCDSKTPE50 is for physical hosts."
Yes, it's ok, we understand that those both subscriptions are created, the problem is that the subscription for '50 virtual desktops' associated with the previuos content host id, is not removed.
Do you know if the issue persist on Sat 6.2? MOving the needinfo over to Justin. Justin, do you know if this is the behavior in 6.2? I don't know that the issue is well defined in the original comment, i certainly don't understand the issue that is described. Edu, can you properly write out reproducer steps in as clear detail as possible? preferabbly like: 1. First step written out 2. Second step written out 3. etc... and upload any manifest you used. (In reply to Justin Sherrill from comment #10) > I don't know that the issue is well defined in the original comment, i > certainly don't understand the issue that is described. > > Edu, can you properly write out reproducer steps in as clear detail as > possible? preferabbly like: > > 1. First step written out > 2. Second step written out > 3. etc... > > and upload any manifest you used. Justin, We have 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (50 pack), Premium' type subscriptions for our hosts connected to Satellite. In order to reproduce the issue you can perform the following steps: 1a. Subscribe a host to an Activation Key subscription-manager register --org="MyOrg" --activationkey="AK1" 1b. Go to 'Content' --> 'Red Hat Subscriptions', you can see one subscription of type 'Guests of name_of_just_subscribed_host' 2. Re-subscribe the host to the same or different activation key, you can unregister before, or just add --force parameter, the result is the same subscription-manager unregister subscription-manager register --org="MyOrg" --activationkey="AK1" 3. If you go again to 'Content' --> 'Red Hat Subscriptions', you will a new subscription of type 'Guests of name_of_just_subscribed_host', but you can notice that the previous one already exists. If you put the mouse over the link, you can see the reference to the content host, but only the last one has a valid content host. So after re-subscription, Satellite seems to delete correctly the previous content host, but the 'Guest of...' type subscription remains. Let us know if you need more information. Regards Thanks for that! To answer brad's question, yes this should be resolved in 6.2, although I haven't verified that. (In reply to Justin Sherrill from comment #12) > Thanks for that! > > To answer brad's question, yes this should be resolved in 6.2, although I > haven't verified that. Do you mind double check please? Hi, could we have a confirmation about this BZ please We will not be addressing this bug in the 6.1 code base. If you have concerns with this, please feel free to reach out to me with any concerns or issues you may have. Thank you. |