Bug 1419153
Summary: | Please branch for epel7 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Miller <admiller> |
Component: | python-shade | Assignee: | Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | ftaylor, ghacker, lars, pabelanger, rlocke |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-05-29 11:19:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adam Miller
2017-02-03 17:29:19 UTC
This is on my list to do, but until all the dependencies are added to epel7 for shade, there is little to no point. Specifically, the openstack clients need to be moved into epel7. And speaking with RDO developers, they have little interest in doing this. Does it make sense to consider this with the assumption of RDO being enabled? Not sure about the politics of making this work (since I requested Adam to create this). RDO doesn't have python-shade packaged either, because it's development model apparently makes it difficult to package for a particular openstack release. Some context here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/2016-August/msg00213.html There is apparently some upstream work going on to make shade more palatable for this sort of scenario. Yes, shade is in the process of removing dependencies on the openstack python clients, in place it will just make the REST calls itself. Once this work has been completed, it will be much easier to manage the package dependencies. I expect once that work is done, we'll be able to land this into epel7 easier. For now, I'm doing my best to keep rawhide up to date. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. *** Bug 1460748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '26'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |