Bug 141998
Summary: | symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0: undefined symbol: xmlNewTextReaderFilename | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Lijowski <michal> | ||||
Component: | libxml2 | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 3 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-12-06 17:24:49 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Michal Lijowski
2004-12-06 17:13:37 UTC
Created attachment 107968 [details]
/tmp/xses-michal.ADRqWc
Seems relatively clear to me that you have an old libxml2-2.4.x shared library laying around in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH and taking predecedence over the system 2.6.16 library. Use "ldd evolution" to find out what libxml2.so.2 is is using and fix this. This does not look like a fedora bug, but IMHO and user or system setting error. If ldd indicates that the libxml2 shared library used comes from a Fedora core package, please reopen the bug indicating what package provided the libxml2.so.2 library generating the problem. Daniel Thank you, Daniel. I have ActiveTcl and ldd /usr/bin/evolution gives libxml2.so.2 => /usr/local/ActiveTcl/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x00a43000) Michal Okidoc, I think it's the second time the ActiveTcl generated some mess, I should alk to them, but over the mailing-list at gnome.org. You should also open a bug on their side to track this down, in the meantime I think this one can be safely closed. thanks for the feedback, Daniel |