Bug 142
Summary: | glib-devel-1.1.3-1 package missing glibconfig.h | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Damien, Miller <dmiller> |
Component: | biff | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | borgia, rdegr, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1998-11-20 12:07:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Damien, Miller
1998-11-20 00:49:47 UTC
Um... a) we don't ship glib-devel in 5.2 (it's in the gnome dir, but it's not part of the distribution) b) glibconfig is in that package... /usr/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h *** Bug 613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** in /usr/include, add a symlink to ../lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h ------- Additional Comments From dkl 12/31/98 15:36 ------- glibconfig.h is a system dependent header. Therefore it lives in /usr/lib, not /usr/include. /usr/include is shareable across architectures. The correct gcc line for building glib apps just need to include the directory that glibconfig.h lives by including "-I/usr/lib/glib/include" on the command line. *** Bug 1019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** My glib.h #include glibconfig.h but there is no glibconfig.h to be found. Discovered this problem the first time I tried to use gcc. /usr/include/glib.h:22 glibconfig.h: No such file or directory There was an undefined symbol G_GNUC_NORETURN which I had to comment out of a source file to compile a newer version of GIMP. ------- Additional Comments From ayn2 02/02/99 01:36 ------- This looks as a duplicate of reports #142 and #613 |