Bug 1420633
Summary: | Plugin packaging guidelines && plugin white-listing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> |
Component: | firefox | Assignee: | Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | gecko-bugs-nobody, jhorak, kengert, pjasicek, stransky |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-02-20 12:52:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pavel Raiskup
2017-02-09 06:46:34 UTC
Hello, you can install your system extensions to /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/ (and use firefox ID subdir here). It's a location for system-wide extensions and should be enabled by default. You can also check rpm for existing packaged extensions - mozilla-noscript rpm package for instance. Another thing is that Firefox is moving to WebExtensions fast and XUL extensions may be disabled sooner or later - AFAIK current plan is end of 2017. I'd recommend to check if vimperator is going to switch to WebExtension first to package it in Fedora. Cool, it sounds like there's a way to package properly ATM.
> Another thing is that Firefox is moving to WebExtensions fast and XUL
> extensions may be disabled sooner or later - AFAIK current plan is end of
> 2017. I'd recommend to check if vimperator is going to switch to
> WebExtension first to package it in Fedora.
Sorry for the naive question, but does this mean that downstream packaging
of Firefox's plugins won't be possible in future (with WebExtension)?
Otherwise I think I'm not blocked to package vimperator just now, right?
Because if Firefox switched to new plugin format, vimperator is going to
be migrated... (I think there's motivation if there's ~30 000 users
far). Or what's behind your note?
(In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #2) > Cool, it sounds like there's a way to package properly ATM. Sure. > > Another thing is that Firefox is moving to WebExtensions fast and XUL > > extensions may be disabled sooner or later - AFAIK current plan is end of > > 2017. I'd recommend to check if vimperator is going to switch to > > WebExtension first to package it in Fedora. > > Sorry for the naive question, but does this mean that downstream packaging > of Firefox's plugins won't be possible in future (with WebExtension)? I expect it will be possible to package WebExtension based addons. > Otherwise I think I'm not blocked to package vimperator just now, right? Yes, you can package any extension you want. I'm not sure such package is useful (I think direct install via Firefox to Firefox profile from AMO is better) but that's really your decision. > Because if Firefox switched to new plugin format, vimperator is going to > be migrated... (I think there's motivation if there's ~30 000 users > far). Or what's behind your note? If the vimperator is not going to be migrated (I have no idea what's their plans) your package may be obsolete by end of this year. (In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #3) > If the vimperator is not going to be migrated (I have no idea what's > their plans) your package may be obsolete by end of this year. Thanks. I've googled a bit for this few days ago .. and it seems that the new extension system is a bit less powerful (according to forum rumors) to implement vimperator as is ... so it was a bit unclear to me what is going to happen with vimperator and with firefox projects; one would expect that vimperator is important plugin enough for whole firefox, but apparently it is not; similarly ~30k users of vimperator probably doesn't 100% mean that it is going to survive this firefox's transition. Maybe it all just means should try to migrate to different plugin (or browser). Thanks a lot for your support, Martin. I'm not interested now in the plug-in package guidelines so feel free to reopen if it is on your radar. |