Bug 142068

Summary:	/scripts/functions errors/warnings
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Ready Certification Tests	Reporter:	Will Woods <wwoods>
Component:	rhr2	Assignee:	Rob Landry <rlandry>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	beta	CC:	richardl
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-04-29 13:45:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Will Woods 2004-12-07 01:24:50 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
1. 

STORAGE ./scripts/functions: line 88: [: sda: binary operator expected

2.

when starting, we see

./scripts/functions: line 244: $TERMINAL: ambiguous redirect

3. 

CDROM

Building package..../scripts/functions: line 256: $TERMINAL: ambiguous
redirect

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
run ispec

Additional info:

Comment 1 Will Woods 2004-12-07 01:34:46 UTC

the second problem actually says line 244 the first time, and then the
same message about line 251 a screen's worth of times. 

We submitted the results RPM, and here's a link to the result ID for that:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/hwcert/hardware.cgi?cert_id=133815

Comment 2 Rob Landry 2004-12-07 01:55:22 UTC

Unfortunately I don't see any attachments in this bugzilla and I don't
see the results package @ the above link.

Comment 3 Rob Landry 2005-04-14 17:30:15 UTC

ambiguous redirect should be resolved, otherwise we'll need a reproducer if
there's still a missing quote somewhere causing the line 88 problem above.

Comment 4 Rob Landry 2005-04-29 13:45:49 UTC

I'm going to go ahead and close this one, since the redirect thing should of
been fixed earlier.