Bug 1421111

Summary:	[Doc RFE] Document guidelines and instructions (as determined) regarding how to confirm/verify that in-flight encryption is enabled/functioning for CNS 3.5 volumes.
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Component:	doc-Container_Native_Storage_with_OpenShift	Assignee:	Bhavana <bmohanra>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	cns-3.5	CC:	asriram, bmohanra, hchiramm, kramdoss, mliyazud, pprakash, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, storage-doc
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	CNS 3.5	Flags:	hchiramm: needinfo-
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-11-17 05:18:50 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1415610

Description Anjana Suparna Sriram 2017-02-10 11:32:10 UTC

Additional info:

- For example, RHGS administrator manually sets up certificates and configuration through login at the RHGS server container.
- (from Humble) “As discussed in our planning exit meeting, this belongs to 'static provisioning' section. Setting up everything before we install cns is the plan for now. However we are exploring the feasibility of bind mount and secrets to pass the certs to gluster pod. If test turn green on this feature, we may have a section before trying cns-deploy.”

Comment 2 Anjana Suparna Sriram 2017-02-10 12:26:05 UTC

*** Bug 1420287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Bhavana 2017-04-10 06:33:26 UTC

Hi Humble/Ashiq,

Can you please review this section and share your comments, so that I can incorporate the same before moving this to on qa.

Thanks!

Comment 11 Humble Chirammal 2017-04-10 10:03:07 UTC

(In reply to Bhavana from comment #10)
> Hi Humble/Ashiq,
> 
> Can you please review this section and share your comments, so that I can
> incorporate the same before moving this to on qa.
> 
> Thanks!

This draft LGTM. Please move to ON_QA.

Comment 15 Bhavana 2017-04-11 04:00:31 UTC

Hi Ashiq,

Are we going ahead with "disabling encryption on a CNS setup" too?.


Also, I might have to discuss some of the points mentioned in comment 4, and make the changes after our discussion.

Comment 19 krishnaram Karthick 2017-04-17 15:14:16 UTC

Looks good to me. Moving the bug to verified.