Bug 1421783

Summary:	rebase ceph-common to 10.2.x series
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Jason Dillaman <jdillama>
Component:	ceph-common	Assignee:	Boris Ranto <branto>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Marek Suchánek <msuchane>
Priority:	high
Version:	7.4	CC:	bhubbard, branto, jdillama, jomurphy, kdreyer, lmiksik, nlevine, sweil, tchandra, tmuthami, yselkowi
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Rebase
Target Release:	---	Flags:	tmuthami: needinfo+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-common-10.2.5-4.el7	Doc Type:	Release Note
Doc Text:	The ceph client tools have been updated to version 10.2.5 for enhancements and bug fixes.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-10-30 11:01:43 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1466056, 1466057
Bug Blocks:	1536861

Description Jason Dillaman 2017-02-13 16:30:02 UTC

Description of problem:
This is a request to update the ceph-common packages to the 10.2.x series (Jewel LTS release and the basis of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.x). The 0.94.x series (Hammer LTS) is going end-of-life upstream before the release of RHEL 7.4.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
10.2.x

Comment 2 Boris Ranto 2017-02-16 11:54:27 UTC

@Jason: How much new stuff do we actually want to include? Are we just gonna rebase the base packages that are already there? i.e. as in this build:

https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/buildinfo?buildID=500477

I have been playing with the builds and this is getting quite tricky, it might even require us to get a new package in RHEL (I am still unable to do a fcgi-free build although I'm working on it).

Comment 3 Jason Dillaman 2017-02-16 12:59:35 UTC

@Boris: I was just suggesting rebasing the existing packages, not adding new stuff.

Comment 4 Boris Ranto 2017-02-22 22:05:52 UTC

I finally got a working scratch build:

https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=12605674

Eventually, I was able to hack out the necessity for a new dependency (fcgi).

Comment 5 Boris Ranto 2017-03-16 10:16:00 UTC

@Tamil: Can you qa_ack+ so that we could try to get this into 7.4 acl?

Comment 33 errata-xmlrpc 2018-10-30 11:01:43 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3189