Bug 1421809

Summary: pdfbox: upstream patches to SynchronizedMetaDataValidation
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Merlin Mathesius <mmathesi>
Component: pdfboxAssignee: gil cattaneo <puntogil>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: java-sig-commits, orion, psabata, puntogil, sgallagh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.8.13-1.fc26 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-14 15:03:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline: 2017-02-27   
Attachments:
Description Flags
proposed patch to correct FTBFS issue none

Description Merlin Mathesius 2017-02-13 18:13:11 UTC 
Description of problem:
When attempting to rebuild portions of the frozen package set of Fedora 25 for the Base Runtime effort, we discovered that pdfbox fails to build from source due to a failing self-test. This issue also manifests itself in both Fedora 25 and Rawhide .

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pdfbox-1.8.12-4.fc26

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce (rawhide):
1. fedpkg clone pdfbox
2. cd pdfbox
3. fedpkg switch-branch master
4. fedpkg mockbuild

Actual results:

Results :

Failed tests: 
  TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testAllInfoSynhcronized:422 expected:<0> but was:<2>
  TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testBadPrefixSchemas:499 expected:<7.[4.]2> but was:<7.[]2>
  TestSynchronizedMetadataValidation.testdoublePrefixSchemas:572

Tests run: 72, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO]                                                                         
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Skipping PDFBox reactor
[INFO] This project has been banned from the build due to previous failures.
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO] 
[INFO] PDFBox parent ...................................... SUCCESS [  0.350 s]
[INFO] Apache FontBox ..................................... SUCCESS [  4.566 s]
[INFO] Apache JempBox ..................................... SUCCESS [  1.155 s]
[INFO] Apache XmpBox ...................................... SUCCESS [  2.631 s]
[INFO] Apache PDFBox ...................................... SUCCESS [ 22.237 s]
[INFO] Apache Preflight ................................... FAILURE [  3.093 s]
[INFO] Apache PDFBox for Ant .............................. SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache PDFBox examples ............................. SKIPPED
[INFO] PDFBox reactor ..................................... SKIPPED
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------



Expected results:
Successful build of the package.

Additional info:
This is needed as part of the Base Runtime effort.

Attached is a patch that applies upstream patches to fix the failing self-test.

Please apply the patch or respond with a reason it should not be applied within two weeks. After that time, a provenpackager will go ahead and apply it.
Comment 1 Merlin Mathesius 2017-02-13 18:16:31 UTC 
Created attachment 1249981 [details]
proposed patch to correct FTBFS issue
Comment 2 gil cattaneo 2017-02-14 13:52:10 UTC 
i dont know where and when you discover that the package FTBFS in rawhide
this statement is not true for me. see
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12993
or https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/pdfbox
Comment 3 Merlin Mathesius 2017-02-14 14:31:55 UTC 
A simple Rawhide "fedpkg mockbuild" is reliably failing for me. Since the provided patch is simply pulling in upstream self-test patches (see the link in the spec file patch) and it does resolve a blocker for Base Runtime, we would appreciate if the patch could be included. Thank you.
Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2017-02-14 15:03:23 UTC 
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17856269