Bug 1423835
| Summary: | ledger: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||||
| Component: | ledger | Assignee: | Jim Radford <radford> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 26 | CC: | bexelbie, chad, gour, iliana, jamielinux, pletnev.rusalex, radford | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | ledger-3.1.1-8.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-06 22:25:21 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1423041 | ||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2017-02-17 14:56:05 UTC
Created attachment 1252850 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 1252851 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 1252852 [details]
state.log
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. Related to this FTBFS, ledger.fc26 can't be installed through dnf. [root@flow ~]# dnf install --refresh ledger.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Sat Jun 10 17:40:12 2017 PDT. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libboost_system.so.1.60.0()(64bit) needed by ledger-3.1.1-4.fc25.x86_64 [root@flow ~]# uname -a Linux flow.kiwitree.net 4.11.3-302.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 5 18:40:25 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@flow ~]# grep PRETTY_NAME /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 26 (Workstation Edition)" [root@pc ~]# dnf info ledger Last metadata expiration check: 0:41:07 ago on Sun 09 Jul 2017 07:38:50 AM UTC. Available Packages Name : ledger Version : 3.1.1 Release : 4.fc25 Arch : i686 Size : 4.1 M Source : ledger-3.1.1-4.fc25.src.rpm Repo : fedora [root@pc ~]# uname -a Linux pc.off 4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 29 20:09:48 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The version of source is not fc26. Created attachment 1299098 [details] ledger: Apply patch to fix builds on boost 1.61+ https://github.com/ledger/ledger/pull/465 fixes the build, I've attached the patch to the Fedora git repo. F26 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20545993 rawhide scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20545807 (There appears to be an issue with emacs in the rawhide ppc64le buildroot that seems unrelated to this package.) (In reply to Iliana Weller from comment #8) > Created attachment 1299098 [details] > ledger: Apply patch to fix builds on boost 1.61+ Does this patch work (didn't try building from src yet) and/or any info when it might be applied in order to have ledger-cli available in f26? I'm going to apply my patch (attachment 1299098 [details]) in the next few days with provenpackager permissions unless I hear back from a maintainer asking otherwise. (Will also send an email.)
Getting this package available in Fedora 26 is critical for Fedora's own budget process. Do we have a timeline on your patch and build Iliana? (In reply to Brian (bex) Exelbierd from comment #11) > Getting this package available in Fedora 26 is critical for Fedora's own > budget process. Do we have a timeline on your patch and build Iliana? That's amazing. I'll apply and build it tonight after work. (In reply to Iliana Weller from comment #12) > (In reply to Brian (bex) Exelbierd from comment #11) > > Getting this package available in Fedora 26 is critical for Fedora's own > > budget process. Do we have a timeline on your patch and build Iliana? > > That's amazing. I haven't had time to write the article in the commblog about it I want to, but yeah. https://budget.fedoraproject.org/budget/docs/index.html is built from ledger data in https://pagure.io/fedora-budget/ :) ledger-3.1.1-8.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fbf7010d17 (In reply to Fedora Update System from comment #14) > ledger-3.1.1-8.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. I have not yet done a rawhide build because there are still issues with the rawhide buildroot and the F27 mass rebuild is ongoing. (In reply to Brian (bex) Exelbierd from comment #13) > (In reply to Iliana Weller from comment #12) > > (In reply to Brian (bex) Exelbierd from comment #11) > > > Getting this package available in Fedora 26 is critical for Fedora's own > > > budget process. Do we have a timeline on your patch and build Iliana? > > > > That's amazing. > > I haven't had time to write the article in the commblog about it I want to, > but yeah. > > https://budget.fedoraproject.org/budget/docs/index.html is built from ledger > data in https://pagure.io/fedora-budget/ > > :) Fantastic. I began using ledger a few months ago for my personal finances, but the choice has always felt a little dubious to me. Knowing that Fedora uses it, that gives me more confidence in my choice. ledger-3.1.1-8.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fbf7010d17 ledger-3.1.1-8.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |