Bug 142434
Summary: | popt-1.9.1-21 (which is newer than popt-1.9.1-8) is already installed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | axel.thimm, nobody+pnasrat |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-02-07 19:37:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Scheck
2004-12-09 18:31:09 UTC
Yup, popt versipon needs to change from 1.9.1 to 1.9.3, thanks for the reminder. No matter what, the actual bits in the library have not changed at all. *** Bug 143549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > No matter what, the actual bits in the library have not
> changed at all.
Shouldn't popt be better outsourced from the rpm tarballs? It has
become a rather independent piece of source used by a lot of other
software bits, too. It also seems to have a very different development
pace than rpm itself including the versioning. And bumping up the
version w/o touching the code looks rather hackish.
If rpm still needs it in its tarball (instead of BuildRequiring it),
then remerge popt into rpm's tarball w/o creating popt packages out of
rpm.
popt is critically important to rpm functionality and will not be separated. rpm uses popt more than any other program, and I will not ever go back to external popt for rpm use. Fixed in popt-1.10.1-0.18 (from rpm-4.4.1-0.18 build). |