Bug 1425519
| Summary: | [RFE] Scheduled Job Templates should be named and logged appropriately | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Josh Preston <jpreston> |
| Component: | Remote Execution | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.2.7 | CC: | aruzicka, bkearney, inecas, jcallaha, jpreston, tbrisker |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature, UserExperience |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-04 19:07:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Would including the search query inside the job listing table solve the current issue? It's also possible to specify custom description on per-job invocation bases in the advanced fields, if that's something the user is looking for RE: #2 Possibly, will need to confer with customer for clarification. RE: #3 In the meantime, they will try the advanced fields suggestion. Will confirm with customer and consultant if this is adequate. -- I think the customer's general theme is that during a large maintenance period, they need better operational visibility into the job tasks. Naming them is one appropriate method, but there might be others perhaps by groupings of host collections, etc. Was there any feedback from the customer or the consultant? The general feedback was that while the additional reporting was desired, the performance of the Satellite led operations tasks were better performed in another automation tool, namely Ansible. There were several problems with using Satellite tasks that were easily remedied bypassing Satellite. Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24152 from this bug Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. |
4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here) During a scheduled patch window, timely and less burdensome reporting is required to accommodate a change window. 5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here) When viewing the queued items from the jobs page, they would be named more meaningfully. 6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented. N/A 7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla? No 8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)? No 9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input? Yes 10. List any affected packages or components. NA 11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented? Yes