Bug 142632
Summary: | gettext should include po-mode.el for emacs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Component: | gettext | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dnovotny, i18n-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-04-23 01:08:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jens Petersen
2004-12-11 02:18:42 UTC
Then again po-mode.el is pretty stable these days... Talked with Jens now. Our current idea is to keep po-mode.el in emacs as po-mode.el is pretty stable. There aren't any benefit of moving back to gettext, and we will lose features like enable user to edit po without gettext as well. So let's close it out as wontfix for now and reopen when you feel other advantages overweight the one mentioned above. Reopening this since fedora emacs po-mode.el is out of date. I think we should subpackage po-mode from gettext as an emacs package. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle. Changing version to '13'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 579452 *** |