Bug 1426329

Summary: [Ganesha] : Add comment to Ganesha HA config file ,about cluster name's length limitation
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Component: common-haAssignee: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.10CC: asoman, bugs, rhs-bugs, sbhaloth, storage-qa-internal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.10.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1426326 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-05 00:01:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1426326    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-02-23 17:32:13 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16736 (common-ha: cluster names must be 15 characters or less in length) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-02-24 12:23:55 UTC
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16736 committed in release-3.10 by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle) 
------
commit e31a0b4f3255db8683e03c0a71665e98e03b4307
Author: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Date:   Thu Feb 23 12:31:30 2017 -0500

    common-ha: cluster names must be 15 characters or less in length
    
    Change-Id: Ib9545865cc1fec922824de1be41673320248304b
    BUG: 1426329
    Signed-off-by: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16736
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: soumya k <skoduri>

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2017-04-05 00:01:13 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.1, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.10.1 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030494.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/