Bug 1427
Summary: | ifup-routes failing "linuxconf --hint routing "$1" " | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | francesco.zuliani |
Component: | linuxconf | Assignee: | Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | jack |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1999-03-24 17:13:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
francesco.zuliani
1999-03-05 14:01:22 UTC
what incorrect results does linuxconf give? the command "linuxconf --hint routing eth0" simply return nothings, but then this prevents "/etc/sysconfig/static-routes" file to be read and further static routes to be added. Are you running a 2.0 or a 2.2 kernel? I'm running RedHat 5.2 + updates and kernel 2.0.36. I also noticed that the command "linuxconf --hint routing" does return the following : IPV4ROUTING="false" DEV_RECONF_ROUTES="" BUT as soon as one puts any argument (here eth0, but it seems unrelevant): linuxconf --hint routing eth0 then linuxconf fails to give any output and so doing prevents adding of static routes written in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes Added Jacques to the CC line I can't reproduce this with linuxconf 1.14, and we've received conflicting reports that linuxconf IS giving output from /etc/sysconfig/static-routes (output that used to work, but failed with a newer set of network utilities) so I think that this is specific to Francesco's configuration. Linuxconf is probably looking at the device configuration and is not able to find a device to which the static route applies. Unless the gateway is directly reachable on one of the local networks, linuxconf will not add a static route, for example. So without further information, I have to consider this a configuration problem on the remote machine. I think I would want to have an archive of /etc/sysconfig/static-routes and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg* in order to examine this any further. ------- Email Received From Jacques Gelinas <jack.ca> 03/24/99 13:15 ------- |