Bug 1428072

Summary:	nfs: Fill in pargfid in NFS requests
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Vijay Bellur <vbellur>
Component:	nfs	Assignee:	Vijay Bellur <vbellur>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	mainline	CC:	bugs, kvigor, ndevos
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	kvigor: needinfo-
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-11-20 09:00:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vijay Bellur 2017-03-01 19:05:55 UTC

nfs: Fill in pargfid in NFS requests

Summary:
- The NFS server would occasionally send requests to the bricks which contained
  a null parent gfid and a name, even though a proper parent inode was available.
  This caused name resolution to fail on the brick. When this occurred while trying
  to obtain a lock on a file, it could lead to the NFS server concluding there was
  a lack of consensus, and hence returning EROFS.
- This is a cherry-pick of D3064740 into 3.8

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Siravara <sshreyas>

Change-Id: Iae63c1f39abe74d4101058f494d1e14fda1c1912
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/16180
Tested-by: Shreyas Siravara <sshreyas>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Vigor <kvigor>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-03-01 20:42:50 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/16810 (nfs: Fill in pargfid in NFS requests) posted (#1) for review on master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur)

Comment 2 Niels de Vos 2017-03-27 12:07:21 UTC

Kevin, I've left a message in https://review.gluster.org/16810 for you to review.

Comment 3 Jiffin 2018-11-20 09:00:09 UTC

This bug is too old, there is not much development happening in favour of gluster-nfs as well.Hence closing this bug as  defered