Bug 1430013

Summary:	Failure adding scope in Compliance Policy/Control Policy
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Pavel Zagalsky <pzagalsk>
Component:	UI - OPS	Assignee:	Harpreet Kataria <hkataria>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.8.0	CC:	fsimonce, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo, pzagalsk
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	cfme-future
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-12-26 08:11:58 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	Bug
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	CFME Core	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pavel Zagalsky 2017-03-07 16:22:29 UTC

Description of problem:
Infninte spinner will appear when pressing on "???" in new Container Image Compliance Policy/Control Policy menus


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Control --> Explorer --> Policies --> Compliance Policies 
2. Press on Configuration --> Add new Container Image Compliance Policy
3. Press on the "???" button (href="/miq_policy/exp_token_pressed?token=1")

Actual results:
Infinite spinner appears

Expected results:
The user should be able to add Scope of the Compliance Policy


Additional info:
This is the error that appears in evm.log:
[----] E, [2017-03-07T11:16:43.633589 #17863:10dd134] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::OpenshiftEnterprise::ContainerManager::Refresher#fetch_hawk_inv) <html>

Comment 2 Federico Simoncelli 2017-03-15 08:29:35 UTC

Pavel can you check if this happen for the other entities as well (for example VMs, etc.). Thanks.

Comment 3 Pavel Zagalsky 2017-04-23 07:24:16 UTC

I observe the same behaviour when attempting to add a new VM and Instance Compliance Policy.
At the latest version (5.8.0.11) I see the spinner very briefly without any following action

Comment 4 Federico Simoncelli 2017-04-24 07:51:28 UTC

Based on comment 3 this seems to be generic (not container specific).

Comment 5 Dave Johnson 2017-07-14 02:50:11 UTC

Please assess the impact of this issue and update the severity accordingly.  Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity for a reminder on each severity's definition.

If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set it to Low/Low.

Comment 7 Pavel Zagalsky 2017-12-26 08:11:58 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1434896 ***