Bug 1431420

I prefer to use source urls like:

 https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/a/agate/agate-1.6.0.tar.gz

makes things simpler or?

Package fails to build: 

 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21359176

> I prefer to use source urls

So do I. However, here the release on pypi is missing the license. So I get the sources from github instead.

> Package fails to build

I was missing a BR, sorry. Fixed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21380042

Thanks, can you update links in ticker making fedora-review able to find new spec and srpm?

I forgot, sorry about that.

- SPEC:  https://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-agate.spec
- SRPM: https://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26.src.rpm

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     /export/work/terjeros/review/1431420-python-agate/licensecheck.txt
[X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[X]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 6 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
      Can this be used in make in docs?
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
[-: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[X]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[X]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[X ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26.noarch.rpm
          python3-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26.noarch.rpm
          python-agate-doc-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26.noarch.rpm
          python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26.src.rpm
python2-agate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
python3-agate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
python-agate-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
python-agate.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
python2-agate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
python-agate-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
python3-agate.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US numpy -> bumpy, lumpy, dumpy
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.



Requires
--------
python2-agate (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-isodate
    python-parsedatetime
    python2-babel
    python2-leather
    python2-pytimeparse
    python2-six
    python2-slugify

python-agate-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

python3-agate (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-babel
    python3-isodate
    python3-leather
    python3-parsedatetime
    python3-pytimeparse
    python3-six
    python3-slugify



Provides
--------
python2-agate:
    python-agate
    python2-agate
    python2.7dist(agate)
    python2dist(agate)

python-agate-doc:
    python-agate-doc

python3-agate:
    python3-agate
    python3.6dist(agate)
    python3dist(agate)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/wireservice/agate/archive/ed9e179a9828f73e786038ca467facbf5c75ae89/agate-ed9e179a9828f73e786038ca467facbf5c75ae89.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 08fde43bb4ab8b90220929a9651b7be4acd0230020cd6d3417a71e6614de1e6b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 08fde43bb4ab8b90220929a9651b7be4acd0230020cd6d3417a71e6614de1e6b



Please check the parallel make thingie on import.


Package is APPROVED.

> Can this be used in make in docs?

I don't think it is possible to build the doc in parallel nor that it will speed up the thing.

Thanks for the review.

(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-agate. You may create the branch "f27" using git in about 10 minutes.

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-02b72f0b2e

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-666266c3d7

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f39ba6e765

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-666266c3d7

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f39ba6e765

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-02b72f0b2e

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

python-agate-1.6.0-2.gited9e179.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.