Bug 143179

Summary: [punjabi] Cons+Virama+Ya should be post-base Ya
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sukhjinder Sidhu <sukhuk>
Component: fonts-indicAssignee: Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: amanpreetsinghalam, eng-i18n-bugs, jnansi
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-27 12:01:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
ATT incorrect combinations in lohit pa fonts
none
here is imge of those combinations
none
Patch for the font
none
Verified Image none

Description Sukhjinder Sidhu 2004-12-17 02:56:36 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
Please note that I extracted the contents of the RPM on a Windows
machine and found these problems.  HOWEVER, this should not effect the
nature of the issues with this font.

The main issue is that it does not implement 'pstf' to create a
post-base form of Ya when entering Virama + Ya.  See TUS 4.0, ch9, p235.

Also, two simple additions of Adak Bindi and Visarg at U+0A01 and
U+0A03 would enable Unicode 4.0 support for the font.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ttfonts-indic-1.6-1.src.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enter Cons + Virama + Ya
2.
3.
    

Actual Results:  You will see the full form of Ya with a Halant (Virama).

Expected Results:  Post-base form of Ya.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Sukhjinder Sidhu 2004-12-17 02:58:37 UTC
Looking at the font in FontLab shows that Lohit Punjabi includes the
glyph for post-base Ya, but it just isn't implemented.

Comment 5 Leon Ho 2005-03-22 13:21:58 UTC
Aman has posted seperate problem to bug 151630

Comment 6 Leon Ho 2005-06-20 04:07:15 UTC
This should be fixed in FC4. Please confirm.

Comment 7 Sukhjinder Sidhu 2005-06-20 14:44:38 UTC
Nope none seem to be fixed.

Post-base Ya is not working nor are U0A01 and U0A03 added to the font.

Comment 9 Lawrence Lim 2005-09-06 00:54:42 UTC
Through the comment from Aman, this bug still exist as the new font package
still cant reproduce post-base Ya. (k + d + /) is the keystroke used.

The rest of the bugs in Comments will be split into individual bug reports.


Thanks.

Comment 12 A S Alam 2006-08-10 08:28:08 UTC
Paritial Fixed
1) (FIXED) 0A01 and 0A03 are included in bug
2) (NOT_FIXED) Original bug 0a15+0a4d+0a2f (Cons + Virama + Ya) issue is not
fixed in latest Rawhide 



Comment 14 Rahul Bhalerao 2006-09-29 02:27:37 UTC
Created attachment 137356 [details]
Patch for the font

Adds the GSUB rule for post-base YA.

Comment 15 Leon Ho 2006-09-29 06:58:36 UTC
Built in 2.0.5-1.

Comment 16 A S Alam 2007-04-27 12:00:20 UTC
Created attachment 153611 [details]
Verified Image

Comment 17 A S Alam 2007-04-27 12:01:20 UTC
Test is verified with following version:
fonts-punjabi-2.1.5-1.fc7