Bug 1432678

Summary: why can't dnf give useful outputs?
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Harald Reindl <h.reindl>
Component: dnfAssignee: rpm-software-management
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: jurikolo, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-16 05:55:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Harald Reindl 2017-03-15 23:30:49 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 2 Igor Gnatenko 2017-03-16 05:55:48 UTC
run dnf --best and you will see more info on broken dependencies.

Comment 3 Harald Reindl 2017-03-16 07:16:03 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 4 Jurijs Kolomijecs 2017-03-16 08:53:51 UTC
(In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #3)
> Yeah everybody out there will know that - NOT - welcome to the real world, i
> am by far one of the most experienced Fedora users but my brain refuses to
> learn parameters which should not exist at all when dnf would have usable
> Defaults 
> 
> DAMNED that is a bug - as a user i do not need to know all sorts of
> non-logical parameters simply because nobody remembers them when not used
> regularly 
> 
> The behavior of yum was perfect over a decade and people with no sense for
> user experience should refrain from touching known behavior in a
> distribution and then pretend it's not a regression

Actually that's fixed already, see https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/blob/347e3b30b916231e3aee4068610bfebe4439daa3/po/dnf.pot#L1649

Comment 5 Harald Reindl 2017-03-16 08:57:52 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 6 Igor Gnatenko 2017-03-16 08:59:35 UTC
(In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #5)
> *lol* "(add '--best' to command line to see why package dependency cannot be
> satisfied)" is all but not a fix - why is --worst the default and how many
> years will it take until DNF offers a compareable user expierienice as YUM
> had it for many years BY DEFAULT?
DNF provides better experience but not bailing on broken dpeendencies, but allows user to install packages / do update of other packages.

/thread.

Comment 7 Harald Reindl 2017-03-16 09:06:20 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)