Bug 1433343

Summary:	Review Request: udisks2 - Disk Manager
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Vojtech Trefny <vtrefny>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, vpodzime
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	vpodzime: fedora-review+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	udisks2-2.6.4-1.fc27	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-03-21 10:34:18 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vojtech Trefny 2017-03-17 12:38:42 UTC

Hi, this is a 're-review' request for udisks2 package. Udisks2 was retired in Fedora 25 and replaced by storaged -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged -- but since then we have agreed with udisks maintainer on merging both projects back (storaged was originally fork of udisks) using the original name 'udisks'. So this is actually just the storaged package renamed back to udisks2.

SPEC: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/udisks2.git/tree/udisks2.spec
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18431649

Comment 1 Vratislav Podzimek 2017-03-17 12:46:26 UTC

As the spec is just a copy of an existing, valid spec used for the 'storaged' package just with 'storaged' replaced to 'udisks' (which is what happened in upstream first) and vice versa (the provides/obsoletes), I don't think there's any problem.