Bug 1434032

Summary: Run ipa-custodia with custom SELinux context
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Petr Vobornik <pvoborni>
Component: ipaAssignee: IPA Maintainers <ipa-maint>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Petr Čech <pcech>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.4CC: jcholast, ksiddiqu, mbasti, nsoman, pvoborni, pvomacka, rcritten, tscherf
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ipa-4.5.0-4.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 09:46:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Vobornik 2017-03-20 15:18:04 UTC
Cloned from upstream: https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/6788

A standard Custodia daemon can work with limited permission and as non-root user. However a ```ipa-custodia``` instance requires more privileges and access to very sensitive files in order to provide functionality for ```ipa-replica-install```. Therefore it must run as root user with a different SELinux context.

Custodia must be able to read:

* /etc/pki/pki-tomcat/alias
* /var/lib/ipa/ra-agent.pem
* /var/lib/ipa/ra-agent.key

Additional resources:

* /run/httpd/ipa-custodia.sock UNIX socket bind
* /var/log/ipa-custodia.audit.log create and write
* /etc/ipa/custodia/server.keys CRUD
* /etc/ipa/custodia/* read
* /var/run/slapd-socket UNIX socket connect

Comment 2 Petr Vobornik 2017-03-20 15:18:54 UTC
Upstream ticket:
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/6788

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 09:46:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2304