Bug 1436094
Summary: | Segmentation fault / Invalid read of size 8 in EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Remi Collet <fedora> |
Component: | libevent | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | steved, tmraz |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libevent-2.0.22-3.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-04-01 17:32:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Bug Depends On: | 1423849 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Remi Collet
2017-03-27 07:20:11 UTC
BTW, just noticed libevent is FTBFS in rawhide... so still use older openssl library... see #1423849 This is most probably a conflict between the old and new openssl being simultaneously used in a single process. In most cases this works fine, but there might be use-cases where it does not. I'll look at patching libevent to use the 1.1.0. Notice: from a quick test
- latest libevent 2.1.8 just build fine in F26 (but introduce a soname bump from 5 to 6)
- the pecl/event test suite passes without any segfault
> This is most probably a conflict between the old and new openssl being simultaneously used in a single process.
Indeed.
php-pecl-event rebuild in rawhide, "full" test suite passes without any segfault. Thanks for the quick fix. libevent-2.0.22-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f1d16808df Of course at least in Rawhide it would be much better if libevent was updated to current upstream version. But I suppose doing soname bump in F26 branch is not a good idea. (In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #6) > Of course at least in Rawhide it would be much better if libevent was > updated to current upstream version. But I suppose doing soname bump in F26 > branch is not a good idea. +1 libevent-2.0.22-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |