Bug 1436403

Summary:	[RFE] - Extend search bar to allow searching on storage domain type
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Scott Dickerson <sdickers>
Component:	Frontend.Core	Assignee:	bugs <bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.1.0	CC:	bugs, dfediuck, tnisan, ylavi
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release:	---	Flags:	ylavi: ovirt-future? rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-05-27 13:59:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Scott Dickerson 2017-03-27 20:53:26 UTC

Currently, when on the main storage tab of the admin portal, there are a number of additional filters/search terms that may be applied.  No filter is available for "Domain Type".  For example, there is no way to setup the search bar such that only master storage domains are shown.

If a domain type filter is added, the dashboard can use it to filter the specific storage domain types displayed when a user clicks through from the Data Storage Domain inventory card.  Without the filter, users have gotten confused because the Data Storage Domain inventory card only shows data domains.  When they click through (by clicking on the card's title) they may see more storage domains then what is counted on the card.  Dashboard only counts Master and Data storage domains types in its queries.

See BZ1420448, especially 1420448#c6 for how this relates to ovirt-engine-dashboard.

Comment 1 Doron Fediuck 2018-05-27 13:59:40 UTC

Closing old RFEs. Most likely storage domain types will be unified in
the upcoming version(s).
If relevant, please re-open and explain why.
As always- patches are welcomed!