Bug 143701

Summary: Could handle missing splash image better
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nigel Horne <njh>
Component: grubAssignee: Peter Jones <pjones>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-01-05 16:13:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nigel Horne 2004-12-24 13:23:12 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20041020

Description of problem:
If splashimage points to a missing file, it would be better if
grub defaulted to a text mode, however the screen is blank and
you're left wondering what to do. Not even a warning message
that the splash image can't be found appears.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
grub-0.95-3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit /etc/grub.conf so that splash image points to a non existant
hard drive partition, e.g. splashimage=(hd0,9)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
2. reboot
3.
    

Actual Results:  You probably get a blank screen, at best you get a
garbled display

Expected Results:  A text mode default and an error message that
splashimage can't be found.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2004-12-30 18:52:05 UTC
I totally agree with you, it's a worse problem. 

Maybe the bootsplash image should be checked for availability *and* readability,
because with bug #143879 I currently run into the same result.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2005-01-04 19:22:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112330 ***

Comment 3 Peter Jones 2005-01-04 19:52:15 UTC
It's not *really* a dup, just very closely related.  I want to leave
it open for now.

Comment 4 Peter Jones 2005-01-05 16:13:32 UTC
Nevermind, it is a dup, I was looking at the wrong bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112330 ***