Bug 1437296

Summary: [RFE] add true select all ability for Errata Installation under Host Collections
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: anerurka
Component: Errata ManagementAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: jcallaha
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2.8CC: ajambhul, bbuckingham, bkearney, bwallace, jcallaha, jsherril, raghavan.subramanian, suarora, walden
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-03 02:43:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description anerurka 2017-03-30 01:34:42 UTC 
Description of problem:

Select all ability for Errata Installation under Host Collections is not working properly. 

Lets assume client have 50 erratas available to install. When we select the "Type"  check box in under Host Collection --> Errata Installation, which selects the Erratas, it only selects the first 20 erratas. 

We need to scroll down till end of the errata page. After that checking "Type" option will select all the erratas. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Satellite 6.2.8

How reproducible:

Always.


Steps to Reproduce:

1. Select the "Type"  check box in under Host Collection --> Errata Installation who have more than 20 erratas available for installation.

2. Attempt to select all errata

3. Notice it will select only first 20.

Actual results:

Notice it will select only first 20.

Expected results:

It should select all the available erratas
Comment 1 Brad Buckingham 2017-04-03 15:58:40 UTC 
Hi Walden, do you know if this request has been addressed as part of the work upstream for non-nutupane, paging...etc?  Thanks!
Comment 2 Walden Raines 2017-04-17 13:51:55 UTC 
(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #1)
> Hi Walden, do you know if this request has been addressed as part of the
> work upstream for non-nutupane, paging...etc?  Thanks!

No, this would not have been implemented as part of those changes.
Comment 3 Brad Buckingham 2018-07-23 20:21:21 UTC 
*** Bug 1605986 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Justin Sherrill 2020-02-03 02:43:06 UTC 
This is a duplicate, support being added in 6.7

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1731136 ***