Bug 1438452
Summary: | libtiff: Divide-by-zero in tif_read.c and tiffiop.h | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Andrej Nemec <anemec> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | carnil, erik-fedora, mike, nforro, phracek |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-04-03 13:07:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Andrej Nemec
2017-04-03 12:53:15 UTC
Created libtiff tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1438464] Created mingw-libtiff tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: epel-7 [bug 1438466] Affects: fedora-all [bug 1438465] Hi Is this a duplicate of CVE-2016-10266? (In reply to Salvatore Bonaccorso from comment #2) > Hi > > Is this a duplicate of CVE-2016-10266? Looks like I mispunched 3 instead of 6 at the end of a CVE number... Thanks for spotting it, I will close it as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1438472 *** Hi Andrej, Perfect thank you for the quick confirmation! Regards, Salvatore |