Bug 1439859
| Summary: | cannot create jenkins pipeline buildConfig when no jenkins server preinstall | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Tracy Rankin <trankin> |
| Component: | Build | Assignee: | Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <mmasters> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Wenjing Zheng <wzheng> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | abhgupta, aos-bugs, bparees, dakini, dyan, mmasters, wzheng, xtian |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.5.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
When the RestrictUsersAdmission admission control plug-in is enforcing role binding restrictions and examines a role binding with a service account subject, the plug-in requires that the subject have an explicit namespace that matches some role binding restriction in order to be admitted.
When an application template contains a role binding with a service account subject, typically the subject's namespace is left blank in the template (rather than hardcoding a namespace or requiring a parameter) so that the namespace will be defaulted to the namespace in which the role binding is created. (An example is the jenkins-persistent application template and its jenkins_edit role binding.)
However, this defaulting happens only after admission control is performed.
Consequence:
Role binding restrictions cannot match against role bindings as they are typically specified in an application template (that is, with the namespace left unspecified/blank), and so the RestrictUsersAdmission admission control plug-in rejects these role bindings.
Fix:
The RestrictUsersAdmission admission control plug-in has been changed to treat a blank namespace in a service account subject as implicitly matching the namespace of the role binding restriction.
Result:
The RestrictUsersAdmission admission control plug-in, with appropriate role binding restrictions, will now admit the aforementioned role bindings.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1439065 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2017-04-26 05:36:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1439065, 1439066 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 4
Dongbo Yan
2017-04-10 05:22:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1129 |