Bug 1443959

Summary: packaging: no firewalld-filesystem before el 7.3
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Component: packagingAssignee: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: bugs, mchangir, ndevos
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.11.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-30 18:50:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-04-20 10:56:01 UTC
Description of problem:

RHEL7.2 does not have firewalld-filesystem


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2017-04-20 13:34:09 UTC
current versions of firewalld in 7.3 already require firewalld-filesystem.

The explicit Requires in the .spec for firewalld-filesystem is unnecessary.

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-04-20 13:54:39 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17094 (packaging: no firewalld-filesystem before el7.3) posted (#1) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 3 Worker Ant 2017-04-20 15:34:57 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17094 (packaging: no firewalld-filesystem before el7.3) posted (#2) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 4 Worker Ant 2017-04-20 19:58:44 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17094 (packaging: no firewalld-filesystem before el7.3) posted (#3) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 5 Worker Ant 2017-04-21 11:41:20 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17094 (packaging: no firewalld-filesystem before el7.3) posted (#4) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle)

Comment 6 Shyamsundar 2017-05-30 18:50:19 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.11.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.11.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-May/000073.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/