Bug 1448354

Summary: vdsmd.service fail to start because libvirt 3.2 uses GSSAPI (kerberos) instead of the insecure DIGEST-MD5 as a default mechanism
Product: [oVirt] vdsm Reporter: Pei Zhang <pzhang>
Component: GeneralAssignee: Dan Kenigsberg <danken>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: meital avital <mavital>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.19.12CC: bugs, chhu, dyuan, xuzhang, yafu, yanqzhan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-07 06:52:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Virt RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pei Zhang 2017-05-05 09:26:26 UTC
Description of problem:
vdsmd.service fail to start with lasted libvirt(libvirt-3.2.0-4.el7.x86_64
), because libvirt use GSSAPI (kerberos) instead of the insecure DIGEST-MD5 as a default mechanism. Using old configuration vdsmd can start successfully.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.19.12-1.el7ev.x86_64
libvirt-3.2.0-4.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install libvirt, vdsm packages
2. 
#vdsm-tool configure --force

#systemctl restart vdsmd       
Job for vdsmd.service failed because the control process exited with error code. 

3.
#vdsm-tool -vvv is-configured  
Current revision of multipath.conf detected, preserving
......
libvirt is already configured for vdsm
Modules passwd are not configured
Error:  

One of the modules is not configured to work with VDSM.
......

4. change libvirt.conf in sasl2 and use the old configuration: 

#vim /etc/sasl2/libvirt.conf
......
mech_list: DIGEST-MD5
sasldb_path: /etc/libvirt/passwd.db
......

#systemctl restart vdsmd

vdsmd service can start successfully.

Actual results:
vdsmd.service fail to start 

Expected results:
vdsmd.service can start successfully.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2017-05-07 06:52:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1444426 ***