Bug 1448472

Summary: [Ref-Arch] HA typo for Install Integrated Capsule On First Node
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Kenny Tordeurs <ktordeur>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: satellite-doc-list
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: satellite-doc-list
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.9CC: adahms, bthurber, swadeley
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-23 05:20:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1425213    

Description Kenny Tordeurs 2017-05-05 13:43:22 UTC 
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/sites/default/files/attachments/sat6ha-lb-refarch.pdf
https://access.redhat.com/articles/2474581

Section Number and Name: 
4.1.3.2 Install Integrated Capsule On First Node - satnode1
[root@satnode1 /]# satellite-installer --scanario capsule \ 

Describe the issue: 
=> typo "scanario" vs "scenario"

Suggestions for improvement: 
scenario

Additional information:
Comment 1 Stephen Wadeley 2017-05-05 14:05:31 UTC 
Hello Balaji

Can you take care of this?


Thank you
Comment 2 Kenny Tordeurs 2017-05-09 17:06:42 UTC 
Still present in [0]

[0] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/reference_architectures/2017/html-single/deploying_a_highly_available_red_hat_satellite_server_6_environment/#create_shared_filesystems_for_ha_lvm
Comment 4 Andrew Dahms 2018-07-23 05:20:33 UTC 
This bug was raised against the document "Deploying a Highly Available Red Hat Satellite Server 6 Environment", for which customers are now being asked to contact Red Hat (either their account team or consulting team) directly for assistance.

Because the product documentation team is unable to process this request, and in consultation with the Reference Architecture team, I am now closing this bug.

See the following article for more information -

https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1603283