Bug 1448971
| Summary: | Service Dialog Check Box Required Field Cannot be Unchecked if previously set | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Jeffrey Cutter <jcutter> |
| Component: | UI - OPS | Assignee: | eclarizi |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Shveta <sshveta> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.7.0 | CC: | hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo, pjakobs, simaishi |
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||
| Target Release: | 5.9.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | service:dialog | ||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.9.0.2 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-03-01 13:12:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jeffrey Cutter
2017-05-08 23:00:06 UTC
I questions the same thing when this feature was first requested, but the use-cases for supporting the required flag on the checkbox makes sense. The main use-case is enforce ackownlgedgment of something before the dialog can be submitted. This could be a "Do you agree to the terms?" type of question or just validating that the user interacts with the dialog instead of just pressing submit. I have added this to the case already: the request is not with regards to the GUI (although the term "ceckbox" is leading to that thought) but the API. If they have a checkbox item, and the request comes through the API, they want to enforce that it's either true or false but not omitted. I think in that way, it does makes sense. pj This should be fixed by this commit: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/7a95d49b47b434cbd3d6e7d2b223ebdc53fe33e0 Which originated from this BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495971 Fixed in 5.9.0.4.20171024163837_ef71ea6 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0380 |