Bug 1449726

Summary:	sss_nss_getlistbycert() does not return results from multiple domains
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Component:	sssd	Assignee:	SSSD Maintainers <sssd-maint>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Scott Poore <spoore>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.3	CC:	grajaiya, jhrozek, ksiddiqu, lslebodn, mkosek, mzidek, pbrezina, sbose, sgoveas, spoore, tscherf
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sssd-1.15.2-30.el7	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-01 09:06:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1445445

Description Jakub Hrozek 2017-05-10 14:16:37 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3393

This is the nss variant of https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3385. If a certificate is assigned to users from different domains only the results for one domain are returned.

Comment 2 Jakub Hrozek 2017-05-10 14:28:09 UTC

* master: 71731d26dc4f2c36989779f327b0e9a399486e14

Comment 7 Scott Poore 2017-06-01 21:24:18 UTC

Jakub,

Should this be moved back to post along with bug #1445445?  and get exception flag?  Or is this issue still being fixed?

Thanks,
Scott

Comment 8 Jakub Hrozek 2017-06-03 17:20:01 UTC

(In reply to Scott Poore from comment #7)
> Jakub,
> 
> Should this be moved back to post along with bug #1445445?  and get
> exception flag?  Or is this issue still being fixed?
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott

Honestly I don't know, I would defer this bug to Sumit.

Comment 9 Sumit Bose 2017-06-06 08:21:28 UTC

Since bug #1445445 should be fixed in sssd-1.15.2-43.el7, I'd like to ask you to re-test this ticket with sssd-1.15.2-43.el7.

Comment 10 Scott Poore 2017-06-06 13:14:19 UTC

Sumit,

Isn't the test/verification I did in bug #1445445 the same test for this one?

Or is there some other way I should verify this?

Should this bug be moved into POST so it's moved to ON_QA so I can officially mark it verified?

Thanks,
Scott

Comment 11 Sumit Bose 2017-06-06 14:48:27 UTC

Of course you are right, the verification of bug #1445445 verifies this ticket as well. The important point is that the testing is done on the client but this is the case according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445445#c19.

I set the state to ON_QA.

Comment 12 Scott Poore 2017-06-06 18:52:02 UTC

Verified.

Version ::

sssd-1.15.2-43.el7.x86_64

Results ::

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445445#c19

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 09:06:23 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:2294