Bug 1450190
Summary: | file /usr/bin/remap conflicts with EMBOSS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | J. Randall Owens <jrowens.fedora> |
Component: | wcstools | Assignee: | Mattia Verga <mattia.verga> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 25 | CC: | mattia.verga, mmahut, tcallawa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-05-20 08:30:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
J. Randall Owens
2017-05-11 18:53:00 UTC
N.B. Despite the fc24 in its release, EMBOSS is still in the Fedora 25 release. It just wasn't rebuilt since 24. I think renaming in an arbitrary way would be a bad choice, since users rely on upstream command names. Following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Binary_Name_Conflicts I'm going to write an email to ask upstream to use a less generic command name. I also add in CC to this bug EMBOSS maintainer, because we must advise also EMBOSS upstream to use less generic names (I see a lot of generic command names are present in EMBOSS). As last chance I will discuss on distributions-list[at]freedesktop.org how to rename that command. I've renamed "remap" to "em_remap" in EMBOSS in rawhide. I've requested wcstools upstream to rename that binary, but I've received no reply. I'm renaming "remap" to "wcsremap" in rawhide. I see that Debian guys use the same name. |