Bug 1451811

Summary:	Add support for fusionIO devices
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Storage Console	Reporter:	seb
Component:	ceph-ansible	Assignee:	Sébastien Han <shan>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	2	CC:	adeza, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, gmeno, hnallurv, kdreyer, nthomas, sankarshan, tserlin, vakulkar
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-ansible-2.2.6-1.el7scon	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-06-19 13:17:41 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description seb 2017-05-17 14:52:44 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 3 seb 2017-05-17 14:54:22 UTC

upstream patch: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1527
backport: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1540

for now, let's just make sure this doesn't break anything, do not test FusionIO devices.

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2017-05-17 19:58:19 UTC

This BZ is does not describe the risks of not taking these fixes for RH Ceph Storage 2.3.

Would you please fill out "Steps to Reproduce:", "Actual results:", and "Expected results:"? Without this information, it is not likely that the QE team will ack this bug.

Comment 5 Vasu Kulkarni 2017-05-17 20:12:57 UTC

None of our labs have fusionio devices :), but it nice to have those fio* drives detected. for the diff change, i believe not much can be done other than regression coverage.

Comment 6 seb 2017-05-18 14:38:14 UTC

Just released a new tag: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/releases/tag/v2.2.6.
Can we get a new build?

Comment 11 seb 2017-05-19 08:23:00 UTC

Can we just make sure there is no regression with this and that's all?

Comment 13 Vasu Kulkarni 2017-05-19 19:31:40 UTC

I took this yesterday for regression run, its seems fine, so qa-ack, Its going to be useful where we have fio drives, not able to use those devices will be bad.  but we should also add the ability to provide admin the option to choose drives via config items.

Comment 14 Vasu Kulkarni 2017-06-01 21:31:47 UTC

sanity verified.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-19 13:17:41 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1496