Bug 145609

Summary: CAN-2005-0144 Secure site lock can be spoofed with view-source:
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component: mozillaAssignee: Christopher Aillon <caillon>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: impact=low,public=20050120
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-03-23 19:01:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Josh Bressers 2005-01-20 01:57:09 UTC
===================================
Mozilla Security Advisory MSA05-004
===================================

Title:      Secure site lock can be spoofed with view-source:
Severity:   Low
Reporter:   Kohei Yoshino

Fixed in:   Firefox 1.0
            Mozilla Suite 1.7.5


Description
-----------
Kohei Yoshino reports the secure site lock icon can be spoofed by using
a view-source: URL targetted at the secure site whose credentials you want
to appropriate. An insecure page of the attackers choice can then be loaded
while the lock icon shows the previous secure state.

This could potentially be abused by phishers to make their fake login sites
appear more authentic.


Workaround
----------
Upgrade to fixed version


References
----------
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262689

Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-01-20 01:58:06 UTC
This issue should also affect RHEL2.1

Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2005-03-23 19:01:42 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-323.html