Bug 145629
Summary: | cups starts on boot after update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeff Moe (jebba) <moe> |
Component: | cups | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-01-20 11:37:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jeff Moe (jebba)
2005-01-20 08:40:38 UTC
Thanks. This has been fixed in CVS. (The "cup" bugzilla component is for the "cup" package.) Ok. I'm being lazy here as I know I should open separate tickets, but it's late... These packages have a similar problem: iiim pcmcia sendmail I'm putting it here so it doesn't get lost before I forget. ;) Also, what was the voodoo to fix it? It would be handy for us lesser geeks to know how it was fixed in the ticket. Thanks for the quick fix! iiimf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145869 pcmcia: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145871 sendmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145872 Apparently, `chkconfig off` should be used instead of `--del`, so this is actually NOTABUG (?). Per pcmcia resolution by davej. It's not to do with that at all, but caused by the initscript not being marked noreplace. Hmm. Ok, then are the others bugs or not? I closed 'em as NOTABUG after the pcmcia-cs maintainer (davej) said it wasn't a bug. I can re-open those, leave closed, or forget. ;) Also, should /etc/rc.d/init.d/cups really be marked noreplace? I mean, what if there are improvements/fixes to it in future releases? I think davej may actually be right `man chckonfig`: --del name The service is removed from chkconfig management, and any sym- bolic links in /etc/rc[0-6].d which pertain to it are removed. Note that future package installs for this service may run chk- config --add, which will re-add such links. To disable a ser- vice, run chkconfig name off. Sorry if I'm being noisy... Yes, it should be noreplace. Dave said that *you* shouldn't use chkconfig --del, and he's right. The RPM scriptlet *should* use it, however, since it runs after the package is removed. |