Bug 1456420

Summary: Restarting FUSE causes previous FUSE mounts to be in a bad state.
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Component: fuseAssignee: Amar Tumballi <atumball>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Rahul Hinduja <rhinduja>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rhgs-3.2CC: akhakhar, amarts, amukherj, annair, atumball, bchilds, bmekala, cmaiolin, csaba, divya, eguan, eparis, hchen, hchiramm, jarrpa, kramdoss, madam, mchangir, mliyazud, mrobson, myllynen, mzywusko, pdwyer, pprakash, pvarma, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, rreddy, rtalur, storage-qa-internal, tlarsson, zlang
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.2.0 AsyncFlags: atumball: needinfo+
divya: needinfo+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-18.3 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Gluster's FUSE mount process can now process 'auto_unmount' flag. With this new mount option, Gluster FUSE mount process will not leave a 'stale mount point', in case the client process terminates abnormally (like SIGTERM, SIGSEGV, and so on).
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1424680 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-08 09:37:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1424680    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 5 Amar Tumballi 2017-05-29 17:49:58 UTC
Humble, help out in Doc Text. Need better wordings. Lets discuss and finalize tomorrow.

Comment 7 Praveen Varma 2017-05-30 06:27:21 UTC
To let you know, there is an ICE that I am handling which is associated to this BZ and customer would absolutely like to know when the QA would be done and when the release would happen as they are eagerly waiting.

Can one of you please comment and give an ETA?

Thanks,
Praveen
Escalation manager

Comment 11 Divya 2017-06-06 13:46:15 UTC
Thanks Humble!

Amar,

Could you please review and sign-off the edited doc text?

Also, should we document this mount option in the Admin guide [1]?

[1] https://access.qa.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.3/html-single/administration_guide/#sect-Mounting_Red_Hat_Storage_Volumes

Comment 12 Amar Tumballi 2017-06-07 06:55:16 UTC
Ack on content.

If we have not mentioned any other 'mount.glusterfs' options, then there is no need for documenting this.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-08 09:37:05 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1418