Bug 1457782

Summary: [RFE] Order Content View version in descending order in version selection
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: orabin
Component: Content ViewsAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Lai <ltran>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: UnspecifiedCC: bbuckingham
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-07 11:57:12 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
choosing version none

Description orabin 2017-06-01 10:01:58 UTC 
Created attachment 1284110 [details]
choosing version

When creating a new version on a composite content view, the versions to choose for each content view in it should be ordered in a descending order.

Actual Result:
In the attached screenshot the versions are:
23
24
25
26
12
.
.
.
19
20
21
22

Expected Result:
In the attached screenshot the versions should be:
26
25
24
.
.
.
12
Comment 1 Bryan Kearney 2018-11-30 15:00:17 UTC 
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2019-01-04 13:18:12 UTC 
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2019-02-07 11:57:12 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.