Bug 1459570

Summary:	[RFE] allow errata search by providing id or CVE only
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Component:	Errata Management	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Akhil Jha <akjha>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2.10	CC:	bbuckingham, jcallaha, sgraessl
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-02-07 11:57:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pavel Moravec 2017-06-07 13:26:00 UTC

Description of problem:
When searching for an errata and knowing its id (say RHSA-2017:1382) or CVE (here CVE-2017-7502), one has to use filter

id = RHSA-2017:1382
or
cve = CVE-2017-7502

It would be user more-friendly if one can search by providing just the id or CVE, i.e.:

RHSA-2017:1382
or
CVE-2017-7502

(This does not work atm)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite 6.2.9


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Content -> Errata page
2. Click to an errata to know its id and cve
3. Try to search for that errata by just providing the id or the cve to the Search field.


Actual results:
3. returns nothing.


Expected results:
3. to return the expected errata.


Additional info:
Similar functionality works well in searching Hosts.

Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2019-01-04 13:18:18 UTC

The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2019-02-07 11:57:20 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.