Bug 1459681
Summary: | rpmscripts for rsyncd.service are in the wrong package :) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins> |
Component: | rsync | Assignee: | Michal Ruprich <mruprich> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 25 | CC: | code, luhliari, mruprich, ssorce |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rsync-3.1.2-4.fc25 rsync-3.1.2-5.fc26 rsync-3.1.2-4.fc24 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-07-04 01:52:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alan Jenkins
2017-06-07 19:32:42 UTC
(Reproduction additionally assumes the "rsync" package was installed to begin with, so that it is not removed as a leaf package in step 3). Ok I see, it is missing in the spec file. I will fix that. rsync-3.1.2-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8100aed299 rsync-3.1.2-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92a040da1a rsync-3.1.2-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8e092b9210 Thanks for looking at this, but I am confused. rsyncd.service is provided by the rsync-daemon RPM. Are you going to rebuild rsync-daemon as well to fix the bug I reported? rsync-3.1.2-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8e092b9210 rsync-3.1.2-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8100aed299 rsync-3.1.2-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92a040da1a The rsync-daemon is a part of rsync RPM. It is a subpackage... Looking at the latest build in koji the rsync-daemon is rebuilt as well. If you try to download rsync-daemon in Fedora Rawhide, you can see that the latest version is updated as well and the bug is gone. Thanks again! I had gone as far as `dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing check-update`, but it confuses me by only showing the main package. I thought I had also looked at installing rsync-daemon, but unless the sub-package was delayed somehow I must have got it wrong. I made a mistake on Koji as well. It let me submit negative feedback without logging in, so now I can't see any way to remove it. I've added the positive feedback to cancel it back to 0. No problem, thanks Alan. rsync-3.1.2-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rsync-3.1.2-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rsync-3.1.2-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |