Bug 1460042
Summary: | perl-DateTime gets incorrect offset , time and abbreviation in some cases due to not being current. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Mark <mark.a.sloan> |
Component: | perl-DateTime | Assignee: | perl-maint-list |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.9 | CC: | ppisar, psabata |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-06-09 05:21:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mark
2017-06-08 22:21:46 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 reached Production 3 Phase <https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/#Production_3_Phase> when no new features are provided. Therefore this bug report will be closed. If this bug is urgent for you, please contact Red Hat Support <https://access.redhat.com/support> to reevaluate your issue properly. Another option is to migrate to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. getting correct time is a "feature" not a bug huh ? if the tzdata package is being updated still on RHEL 6 why isn't perl-DateTime. they both allow systems to get corrected timezone calculation updates such that time is accurate. i'm raising this via support. it's just as incorrect in RHEL7. (In reply to Mark from comment #3) > getting correct time is a "feature" not a bug huh ? Getting time according to _new_ time zone definition is a feature. (In reply to Mark from comment #4) > if the tzdata package is being updated still on RHEL 6 why isn't > perl-DateTime. Because it's not deemed important enough from point of view of RHEL update machinery. That's why I recommend you to reach Red Hat Support. This is the only way how customers can emphasize their troubles. > i'm raising this via support. > Thanks. > it's just as incorrect in RHEL7. Yes, I know. Again, there was no customer demanding the update. |