Bug 1461212
| Summary: | [RFE][M-5] RBAC for API user access | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Saif Ali <saali> |
| Component: | API | Assignee: | Joe Vlcek <jvlcek> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Antonin Pagac <apagac> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.7.0 | CC: | bascar, cpelland, gblomqui, greartes, gtanzill, jhardy, jocarter, jvlcek, mfeifer, obarenbo, rspagnol, saali, smallamp |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | FutureFeature, RFE |
| Target Release: | 5.11.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-18 13:26:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | Feature | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1581467 | ||
|
Description
Saif Ali
2017-06-13 22:39:19 UTC
Saif, can you add some more details? Are you saying that the user is able to see all the actions available under /api/* or are they able to see managed objects that their RBAC should not allow? Dear customer, The CloudForms team is reviewing the current CloudForms RFE(Request for Enhancement) backlog in order to improve our responsiveness to customers. We are closing any requests for versions no longer within full support(link below to the lifecycle) or that do not have a clear spot on the product roadmap. We are committing to better management of the backlog as we move forward. If you have an RFE that you still have a strong business case for, please open a new BZ against the currently supported version 4.6. Lifecycle page: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/cloudforms If you have any concerns about this, please let us know. Thanks and regards!” *** Bug 1468344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |