Bug 1466675
Summary: | updates-testing is still enabled | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kamil Páral <kparal> |
Component: | fedora-repos | Assignee: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | awilliam, dennis, dgilmore, kellin, kevin, mattdm, mboddu, mruckman, pbrobinson, robatino, sgallagh |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | AcceptedBlocker | ||
Fixed In Version: | fedora-repos-26-1 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-07-06 22:51:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1349188 |
Description
Kamil Páral
2017-06-30 08:38:52 UTC
I'm quite sure this is a blocker, even though I don't see a particular criterion for it now. This one might be the closest one: "A fedora-release package containing the correct names, information and repository configuration for a final Fedora release must be present on release-blocking images and the appropriately versioned generic-release package must be available in the release repository." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Final_Release_Criteria#Release_identification This does make testing that KDE updates-notifier bug easier :) I have a suggestion for the future (maybe not the change to make right now, though): maybe the sources should always have updates-testing enabled (because that's what should happen in rawhide and branched), but have a flag in the spec file which changes this with sed in the %build section? That way, the flip would be a simple specfile update rather than error-prone manual changes to the repo files in source. +1 blocker +1 blocker +1 blocker +1 blocker, indeed the criterion cited is exactly the one that covers this: "correct...repository configuration for a final Fedora release" certainly means "updates-testing should be disabled". That's +4, so accepting. generic-release-26-1 fedora-repos-26-1 fedora-release-26-1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-459d827225 fedora-release-26-1, fedora-repos-26-1, generic-release-26-1 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-459d827225 I can confirm that in RC 1.3 in the Fedora Cloud Base image, updates-testing is no longer enabled. I can also confirm fixed with RC 1.3 Workstation Live. (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #3) > I have a suggestion for the future (maybe not the change to make right now, > though): maybe the sources should always have updates-testing enabled > (because that's what should happen in rawhide and branched), but have a flag > in the spec file which changes this with sed in the %build section? > > That way, the flip would be a simple specfile update rather than error-prone > manual changes to the repo files in source. rawhide has a compeletely different repo file thats enabled. in rawhide fedora, updates and updates-testing are disabled. if you tried to use any of them they would all fail. the only place we have updates-testing enabled is branched before release. (In reply to Dennis Gilmore from comment #12) > rawhide has a compeletely different repo file thats enabled. in rawhide > fedora, updates and updates-testing are disabled. if you tried to use any of > them they would all fail. > > the only place we have updates-testing enabled is branched before release. I think the same thing applies -- wouldn't it be easier to change enabled/disabled for all of these things as a flag in the spec file rather than updating and rebuilding the source tarball? fedora-release-26-1, fedora-repos-26-1, generic-release-26-1 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |