Bug 1469170
Summary: | Corosync should set priority when set of RR scheduler fails | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Jan Friesse <jfriesse> | ||||
Component: | corosync | Assignee: | Jan Friesse <jfriesse> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | cluster-qe <cluster-qe> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 7.5 | CC: | ccaulfie, cluster-maint, mnovacek, pzimek | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | corosync-2.4.0-10.el7 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | ||||
Doc Text: |
undefined
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-10 16:52:19 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1476214 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jan Friesse
2017-07-10 14:50:08 UTC
"Unit test" may be invalid when https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476214 is also merged. Solution is to use -R so corosync doesn't try to move itself into root cgroup. I have verified that NICE value is set to -20 if RTPRIO cannot be set with corosync-2.4.3-1.el7.x86_64. ---- Common part =========== > create new rt group [root@virt-426 ~]# cgcreate -g cpu:test [root@virt-426 ~]# cgset -r cpu.rt_runtime_us=100000 test [root@virt-426 ~]# cgget -r cpu.rt_runtime_us test test: cpu.rt_runtime_us: 100000 > check that corosync start in the correct group [root@virt-426 ~]# cgexec -g cpu:test corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine ('2.4.3'): started and ready to provide service. info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus systemd xmlconf qdevices qnetd snmp libcgroup pie relro bindnow notice [MAIN ] Corosync sucesfully moved to root cgroup [root@virt-426 ~]# ps -T -O cls,rtprio,pri,ni $(pidof corosync) PID CLS RTPRIO PRI NI S TTY TIME COMMAND 20334 RR 99 139 - S ? 00:00:05 corosync 20334 RR 99 139 - S ? 00:00:00 corosync > kill corosync process [root@virt-426 x86_64]# killall corosync [root@virt-426 x86_64]# killall corosync corosync: no process found Before the patch (corosync-2.4.0-9.el7.x86_64) ============================================== [root@virt-426 x86_64]# cgset -r cpu.rt_runtime_us=0 test [root@virt-426 x86_64]# cgget -r cpu.rt_runtime_us test test: cpu.rt_runtime_us: 0 > run corosync in the changed group [root@virt-426 x86_64]# cgexec -g cpu:test corosync notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine ('2.4.0'): started and ready to provide service. info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus systemd xmlconf qdevices qnetd snmp pie relro bindnow > RTPRIO not set and NICE not set [root@virt-426 x86_64]# ps -T -O cls,rtprio,pri,ni $(pidof corosync) PID CLS RTPRIO PRI NI S TTY TIME COMMAND 2463 TS - 19 0 S ? 00:00:00 corosync 2463 TS - 19 0 S ? 00:00:00 corosync After the patch (corosync-2.4.3-1.el7.x86_64) ============================================= > use "-R" so corosync does not try to move to root group [root@virt-426 ~]# cgexec -g cpu:test corosync -R notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine ('2.4.3'): started and ready to provide service. info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: dbus systemd xmlconf qdevices qnetd snmp libcgroup pie relro bindnow warning [MAIN ] Could not set SCHED_RR at priority 99: Operation not permitted (1) > RTPRIO not set but NICE value of corosync changed to -20 [root@virt-426 ~]# ps -T -O cls,rtprio,pri,ni $(pidof corosync) PID CLS RTPRIO PRI NI S TTY TIME COMMAND 2013 TS - 39 -20 S ? 00:00:00 corosync -R 2013 TS - 39 -20 S ? 00:00:00 corosync -R Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0920 |